Sign up ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I tried looking up the word "corps" on and it says it's pronounced "kawr", "kohr", "kawrs", or "kohrs", none of which match the way I've always pronounced it with the "ps" sound. I have always been a little leery saying it this way because it sounds like a dead body, and if you're talking about the Marine Corps then this isn't the best mental image.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 13 down vote accepted

"Corps" and "corpse" both have the same ultimate origin in Latin "corpus" (body).

The former derives from the Latin via Medieval French, as far as I know. The French pronunciation "korr" (or slightly Anglicised to "kohr" or even "kore") is thus the historically correct pronunciation.

Pronouncing it in any way ending with an "s" is not advisable. It certainly won't give others the impression that you're educated. (Worst of all is "corpse" - please never say it like that.)

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the quick response. Is the "s" silent in the plural form too? – Frank Pierce Dec 9 '10 at 21:36
@Frank: Indeed. Again, this follows from French, where the pronunciation of the single and plural forms are the same (both ending in 's'). – Noldorin Dec 9 '10 at 21:46
@Erik Kowal - please read about out editing policies; that edit should not have been approved. Thanks. – medica Jun 13 '14 at 5:33

Corps, which is pronounced like "core," and corpse are two entirely different words, and I have never heard anyone pronounce them the same way. I've never heard anyone say Army "corpse" for example.

share|improve this answer
I know Obama pronounced a variant "corpsman" as "corpse-man" (, and I looked up "corps" as a result since I have been pronouncing it the same way. This is ultimately what lead me to ask this question in the first place... I just didn't want to start a political debate! – Frank Pierce Dec 9 '10 at 22:01
I suspect that the existence of "corpse" is what has caused "corps" to retain its exotic pronunciation. In the case of "corpsman", there is no corresponding pressure. "Corpsman" might have come to be pronounced "core-man", but AFAIK it hasn't. – Colin Fine Dec 10 '10 at 12:04
@colin Just found this site in a related question – mplungjan Feb 1 '11 at 12:10

protected by tchrist Mar 1 at 18:19

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.