Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the difference between being affiliated and being associated with a group of people?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Affiliation is generally a closer and more formal connection than association is. I think affiliation is used more in the professional world than outside. There is a connotation of exclusivity with affiliation. If someone is affiliated with, say, one university, he or she is probably not affiliated with other schools.

(Also, regarding preposition choice, note that in the U.S. you would usually say or write that you are affiliated with or associated with a group of people.)

share|improve this answer
    
British English: usually affiliated to something; very very rarely with. ODO dictionary.com –  Andrew Leach Apr 21 '12 at 17:14
    
@Andrew Leach, Thanks for the reference. I did not know that. I (in the U.S.) don't think I've ever said affiliated to; it sounded very wrong to me. –  JLG Apr 21 '12 at 18:28

Absent any context, affiliated connotes a formal relationship, such as membership, partnership, ownership, or other contractual connection. While associated can also carry this meaning, it can also be used to describe more casual connections, or even where the connection is made only by outsiders.

Context is very important, however, as narrower meanings may apply in various industries, organizations, or legal realms. An "affiliated person" in a U.S. trust or thrift for example, is a person with direct influence in the affairs of the organization, such as an officer or owner (or spouse or immediate family member thereof); "associated person," on the other hand is not to my knowledge assigned any special definition.

An organization might use both terms and define "affiliation" as stronger than "association" or vice versa. It might not use them to express a degree of affiliation at all, however; perhaps "affiliated" refers to members, "associated" to their spouses. There is very little consistency even among organizations of the same type, such as universities or sports federations.

share|improve this answer

Affiliated is a relationship of dependancy, and usually the referent is an organisation rather than an individual. An affiliated school,for example, would operate independently but collaborate with a larger institution that has influence over the schools standards, programmes, exams, etc.

Associated is a relationship of shared purpose or values. The Football Association is for footballers, who presumably all have a shared purpose in promoting football.

share|improve this answer

You have a core group of network, then you have various member groups. Then affiliated non-member groups, who use the network resources but are not controlled members of the network's core group. These affiliated groups operate within the network but are not member groups. Then you have the pro-network, non-network allied groups or networks, who are friendly to the network. Then you have breakaway groups, who were created by/originated from the network core group, as a member group various but broke away or exited the network. Finally, you have the unstable, pro-network groups or individuals, who are the "loose cannons" or "wild cards", who believe in the network but are not officially organized or only organized in special situations, to commit crazy brutal acts, demonstrations, rallies, meetings, etc. all of these types of connections form a group's association to a network, usually.

share|improve this answer
1  
Watch your punctuation. Your output is plain unreadable. –  RegDwigнt Mar 25 '13 at 20:04
    
Welcome to English Language & Usage. All answers should come with explanations for why they are correct, citing research sources (such as links to references) wherever possible. Please edit the answer accordingly. Thanks. –  MετάEd Mar 25 '13 at 23:43
    
do either of you consider my answer wrong? or do you both dislike my answer? what is wrong with my output? why should i be the only person ,who needs to give explanation or research source? –  Carlton oneal Apr 9 '13 at 22:02

protected by RegDwigнt Mar 25 '13 at 20:04

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.