Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Say I'm talking about a car that has less of a tendency to crash than other cars. It is the opposite of a "crash-prone" car. But it isn't "crash-proof" either, in that you can crash it if you try hard enough.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted

How about just crash-resistant?

share|improve this answer
3  
+1 That's what watchmakers do...they pull up short of saying their watches are water-proof and instead call them water-resistant. –  JLG Apr 19 '12 at 16:39
    
Perfect, thank you! I feel kind of dumb now for not thinking of that....it felt like it was on the tip of my tongue! –  rob Apr 19 '12 at 16:53
    
@JLG That's like Titanic: many people thought it to be sinking-proof, while it was in fact sinking-resistant. –  Malcolm Apr 19 '12 at 18:37
    
@Malcom, From some accounts of that dreadful night, it wasn't even sink-resistant, let alone unsinkable. –  JLG Apr 19 '12 at 18:44
add comment

both "-proof" and "-resistant" have connotations of being able to withstand a crash without taking as much damage as might be expected rather than being less likely to get into a crash in the first place, so I'll suggest "-avoidant". Although I'd probably recommend using it as in

The car has good crash-avoidance capabilities

because saying "the car is crash-avoidant" just sounds funny to me.

share|improve this answer
1  
Sounds like a car that can drive by itself, avoiding crashes. –  annawie Apr 19 '12 at 17:26
1  
@annawie: those exist –  Cameron Apr 19 '12 at 18:41
2  
Or -averse. Though both that and -avoidant suggest that the car has agency. –  Henrik N Apr 19 '12 at 20:18
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.