Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My impulse is that it's modifying the verb leads, and is thus an adverb; yet it seems that a case could also be made that it's exerting power on the phrase to extinguishment, a noun, which would make it ... what, exactly? an adjective? I'm confused.

Fame lights a fuse that leads only to extinguishment.

share|improve this question
8  
Do the test. Try replacing it with an adjective, then an adverb. "A fuse that leads beautiful to extinguishment" — nope. "A fuse that leads beautifully to extinguishment" — aye. – RegDwighт Apr 13 '12 at 18:24
I like it! Though "beautiful to extinguishment" has something poetic about it, the case is clear, grammatically--thanks for the tip...! – Bashfuldingo Apr 13 '12 at 18:28
1  
@RegDwightѬſ道 Yes, that works, but where beautifully modifies leads, only modifies to extinguishment. – Brett Reynolds Apr 14 '12 at 1:45

2 Answers

In that sentence, only is an adverb, but to extinguishment isn't a noun. It's a prepositional phrase. It's quite common for adverbs to modify prepositions (e.g., completely under the bed). It's also quite common for adverbs to modify entire noun phrases, (e.g., even a Möbius strip, only the lonely). They rarely modify individual nouns inside noun phrases, though they do occasionally.

share|improve this answer

The sentence could also be written like this:

Fame lights a fuse that does not lead anywhere, except to extinguishment

But it is longer and maybe not as poetic sounding.

In the original wording, "only" emphasizes that there is nowhere else for fame to lead. Omitting "only" changes the meaning and with it, the sentence could be interpreted as

Fame lights a fuse that will likely lead to extinguishment, but there is some chance that it won't.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for this insight. That alternative is interesting and seems to emphasize even more the extinguishment; however, it sacrifices, as you note, a poetic sensibility and a certain economy. I'm glad to have confirmed my reading of the sentence with "only" as well; that it's not superfluous, but adds a certain constraint. – Bashfuldingo Apr 13 '12 at 20:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.