Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was having a discussion with my fiancee about whether or not she was going to take my name when we get married. As of right now, the plan is that she will keep her current last name.

When asked if this will change before our wedding, I said "we will most likely stick with the status quo, and she'll keep her name."

A. Is it incorrect to use the term "status quo" to describe the current state of a micro-topic?

B. Does using it in that sentence conversely imply that that "status quo" is what is normal in society (which is for the female to take the last name), and thus the "status quo" is actually her taking my last name?

Thanks!

share|improve this question
    
Change is certainly afoot (of marital status, not name), and therefore to say the status quo is maintained seems very wrong. –  Ben Voigt May 6 at 21:23
    
@Ben Voigt The term 'status quo' is, I would guess, never used to include 'everything even remotely connected with the changes under consideration'. Its scope is more localised, and here it is obvious that the only potential change being referenced is of the bride's surname. As an example: 'These experts are out of touch, and often they have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. The simple fact is the two markets are ...' [internet] But I bet these experts go home at night. –  Edwin Ashworth May 6 at 21:57
    
@Edwin that's true, but the connection here is anything but remote. –  Ben Voigt May 6 at 22:11
    
The OP has: I was having a discussion with my fiancee about whether or not she was going to take my name when we get married. As of right now, the plan is that she will keep her current last name When asked if this will change before our wedding, I said "we will most likely stick with the status quo, and she'll keep her name." >> It's clear what is being talked about here. There are 167 000 Google hits for "status quo with regard to X ...", with X = possession, the composition, the YZ beach resort, the land acquired, source data, price of cottonseed, fashion.... Many sub-issues. –  Edwin Ashworth May 7 at 14:29

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I agree with JLG: it is fine to use status quo in on less momentous occasions. There is a slight ironical shade in your calling your current names the "status quo", and that is no doubt how you intended it. I would say it.

Using status quo to mean "convention" is not the normal way of using it: I don't think there is any chance that people would mistake your intention for having your wife change her name. The status quo just means the current state of affairs in general, not a specific kind of thing like a convention unless so specified.

share|improve this answer

Does your fiancee consider keeping her maiden name a micro-topic? :)

I would say status quo does get used for micro-topics all of the time, even though it probably should be reserved for political and social issues. It literally means the state in which. It is the existing condition or current state of affairs. So I would say, in your case, the status quo is that your fiancee has her maiden name. Sticking with the status quo means that she will keep her maiden name.

(Just don't ever say current status quo...it's redundant.)

share|improve this answer
    
I've just up-voted your answer simply for the lead ("Does your fiancee..."). It's one of those things I wish I had thought of myself:)... But I have to add that I disagree with your admonition against "current status quo". Some people, say, might be discussing the similarities and differences in the status quo of fifty years ago and today, right? BTW, FWIW, I even remember a discussion somewhere pointing out that "consensus of opinion" is in fact not reduntant. –  Hexagon Tiling Apr 7 '12 at 8:58
2  
@Hexagon Tiling: See grammarist.com/usage/status-quo Because status quo means current state of affairs, the phrase current status quo is redundant. The site gives examples of correct and incorrect use. –  JLG Apr 7 '12 at 13:47

It's quite possible for the local ("micro") meaning of a term to be antonymous with its global ("macro") meaning. A couple good examples are warm beer and cold fusion. Americans drink their beer below room temperature, and so they say that the British, who drink their beer at room temperature drink "warm" beer. And the only way we yet have of doing hydrogen fusion remains, despite intense research dating before the birth of most members of this formum - Project Sherwood, by extremely elevated temperatures (delivered by way of atomic fission), and so the long-sought room-temperature accomplishment of this is called "cold" fusion. So, the global meaning of "room temperature" is contradicted in these two local instances. Thus, we can make the joke that it is possible that cold = warm! Indeed, I recall that in one of his poems Robert Frost makes exactly that kind of joke, namely, about a stream that "runs cold in the summer, and hot in the winter".

Therefore, to answer your question, while it is true that the status quo of your fiancee's decision to keep her family name is in conflict with the status quo that the vast majority of brides don't, it is not a problem. So, the answer to each of your questions, A and B, is "no".

share|improve this answer
1  
How does this answer the OP's questions? –  Armen Ծիրունյան Apr 7 '12 at 10:34
    
@ArmenTsirunyan: I've added a final paragraph to pin that down. –  Hexagon Tiling Apr 7 '12 at 13:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.