English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Which of the following is correct?

I am leaving for London.

I am leaving to London.

I have always thought the first one is correct till I came across the name of this painting.

share|improve this question
related: “where's that to?” – Matt E. Эллен Apr 20 '12 at 9:19
By the way, since the painter is Italian, the title of the painting is not the original title by the artist but a translation from somebody who may not have translated it correctly. – user41919 Apr 5 '13 at 19:21
Agreed. I today certainly wouldn’t translate Il Viaggio di Mosè in Egitto with anything involving “leaving to”. – tchrist Apr 5 '13 at 19:29
up vote 11 down vote accepted

Both are correct, but the first is more common modern parlance. Leaving to is likely an ellipsis of leaving to go to.

share|improve this answer
I don't think it's missing go to at all. As the answer to the question I link to suggests, to by itself is accepted and has been for hundreds of years. – Matt E. Эллен Apr 20 '12 at 9:24
@MattЭллен That question also says "Now only dial. and U.S. colloq." I've never heard it in England (but then I don't often go to Somerset and the West Country), and I'd never use "leave to London". – Andrew Leach Apr 20 '12 at 13:31
@AndrewLeach I bet it's heard (well maybe not the London part) in Somerset, Devon and Cornwall – Matt E. Эллен Apr 20 '12 at 13:42
How about "I'm about to leave to the station?" – Matt E. Эллен Apr 20 '12 at 13:45
I'm happy that it should be a West Country or American dialect. The US inherited many dialectal forms, or has developed them separately [UK: got; US still has gotten]. But I'd never leave to anywhere, it's always leave for. – Andrew Leach Apr 20 '12 at 13:49

"Leave to" is not an American usage - as an American ESL teacher/ editor, I can guarantee that it is not in our grammar books. The accepted standard preposition that completes the infinitive in this case is "for" - in recent times, I've heard an Irish woman using "to" and did a Google search to see if it was perhaps a BE form that I wasn't familiar with.

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Feb 26 '15 at 1:58

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.