English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Could you help me to do a syntax analysis of this sentence?

When would one use the expression the more you squeeze, the more sand trickles through your fingers? I just heard it on Washington Journal used to describe a political strategy, but I would like to know if it can be used for more day-to-day situations.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Robusto, jwpat7, Will Hunting, Mahnax, RegDwigнt Apr 6 '12 at 21:55

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

The above link also demonstrates examples of everyday use. – Robusto Apr 1 '12 at 14:26
I'm no materials scientist, but I'd have thought in the real world it's actually the other way around. I imagine a (largish) hypodermic syringe filled with sand, held point down with no needle fitted. The sand will flow down as it does in an egg-timer. Pushing the plunger down hard would compact the sand, and my gut instinct tells me it would then cease to flow out the other end. – FumbleFingers Apr 1 '12 at 19:31
up vote 4 down vote accepted

It's referring to an analogy or parable. Say you had an item that was solid - a book, or an apple, or a baseball. If you didn't want to lose it, you would hold onto to it tight. Some other possessions don't work that way. If you have a handful of sand or water, you need to cup your hands loosely in order to keep it. If you squeeze them into fists, you'll actually lose possession of your valuable sand or water. If conditions become threatening to your possession (it gets windy, say) you can't just hold on tighter. Even though that works for some things, it doesn't work for sand or water.

Some people apply this analogy to money. When companies squeeze on to their money tighter by cutting back budgets, demanding more paperwork, installing timeclocks to be sure everyone is working enough, and so on, they often lose more money than before they did all that. Once you've established that money in a company acts more like sand or water in your hands than like an apple in your hands, you can just refer back to the analogy without having to give the long explanation of why expenses would go up when you started cutting back budgets, or people would produce less when you demanded they prove they are working more hours, and so on. That explanation is long and perhaps not everyone agrees with it. The image of sand or water dribbling out of your grasp while you desperately try to hold it, that will get you nods of agreement and typically also an emotional response.

share|improve this answer

I don't know if this counts as everyday use, but:

Governor Tarkin: Princess Leia, before your execution, I'd like you to join me for a ceremony that will make this battle station operational. No star system will dare oppose the Emperor now.

Princess Leia: The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

(from *Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope*)

share|improve this answer
I think I could have used it a few times myself in interstellar negotiations, yes! :-) – 719016 Apr 1 '12 at 18:46

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.