English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I heard the following on 'The Office' in episode Downsize (#1.1):

David Brent: I'm going to have to let you go first.

Dawn: What? Why?

David Brent: Why? Stealing. Thieving.

Dawn: Thieving? What am I meant to have stolen?

David Brent: Post-It notes.

What does the 'what am I meant' part mean here? Is it a common expression used in BrE or AmE? Cant we simply say: What have I stolen? What might have I stolen?

share|improve this question
Without more context it is impossible to determine which of at least 2 possible meanings this is meant to convey. 1) This could be a question asking about things the speaker was supposed or destined to have illegally taken from somebody in the past. Or 2) What items that the speakers owns are destined to be taken from him sometime in the future. – Jim Mar 30 '12 at 4:10
@Jim- Included the whole conversation. – Noah Mar 30 '12 at 4:48
Ahh, yes then it is just as aaamos says, "What am I alleged to have stolen?" / "What are you accusing me of stealing?" – Jim Mar 30 '12 at 4:53
up vote 7 down vote accepted

It means the same as "What am I alleged to have stolen?", where the emphasis is deliberately placed to make the listener aware that one is not conceding the point that one has, in fact, stolen anything.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.