Is the expression "Liver's ability to detoxify alcohol was tested..." grammatically correct? Can it also be used for genes, for example: "C-MYC's role in cancer is well known". This is, can gene molecules, organs and other body parts be used as such in sentences like the ones in the examples?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
closed as not a real question by Will Hunting, jwpat7, Matt E. Эллен♦, simchona♦, Mitch Mar 27 '12 at 15:25
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Sure, livers, genes etc. possess properties. In english, that possession is often indicated via an apostrophe ess.
I presume you're asking about the -'s possessive suffix. There's no problem with that. There is a problem, however, with the use of Liver in
Without an article, liver is a meat, a mass noun like beef, never treated as a count noun:
(Well, almost never; Hannibal Lector is an outlier. But the fact that the thought occurs is why the count construction's avoided.)
Presumably, this sentence is about an experiment. Generally, the construction used there would be a Definite Generic The liver.
... and, one more quibble. Epistemologically, one can't actually "test" a generic; the generic liver doesn't exist and is not available for testing -- it's a platonic ideal.