English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When you are negotiating prices with your customer, you might say "that's $200," "that'll be $200," or "that would be $200." Are there any differences among them?

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

That is $200 means the current price is $200. You could tell this to someone who has not expressed any interest in purchasing the item, or you could use it with someone who is actually buying it.

That will be $200 is only used when the person has bought or at least is getting ready to buy the item, and needs to know the price.

That would be $200 is somewhere between the other two - slightly implying that the person you're talking to might buy the item, but not nearly as decisive as will be.

share|improve this answer
Thank you so much! Now i understand the differences. – Hiro Mar 24 '12 at 15:27
Well, Daniel provided no references. So: What if he just made it up? – GEdgar Mar 24 '12 at 16:49
@GEdgar that's what voting it for, essentially, and rep. Welcome to Stack Exchange. – Matt E. Эллен Mar 24 '12 at 21:25
Although that's not to say references wouldn't be nice, but for something as trivial as this, we have enough native speakers here to vote it up without. – Matt E. Эллен Mar 24 '12 at 21:26
Also regardless of a reference, this is how the English language is understood in the United States. The understood meaning of what @Daniel said is exactly correct. – Dale Jun 5 at 13:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.