English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Sometimes after looking at a word for a while, I become convinced that it can't possibly be spelled correctly. Even after looking it up, sounding it out, and realizing that there's simply no other way to spell the word, it still looks wrong.

Is there a shorthand way to describe this feeling so that people will know what I mean without the long explanation?

share|improve this question
It never happens to me. – Mateen Ulhaq Dec 4 '10 at 0:13
I quite like 'spelling dazzle', or 'word glare' :) – Benjol Jan 6 '11 at 10:16
Weird...the word weird always looks weird to me after a while. – Michael Brown Mar 8 '12 at 15:21
+1 Mike! Weird is a word that messes me up too. Wait... that's not right... It's "I before E"... Wierd... Werid... Wired... Werid... Weird... It sure is a Wierd sensation... Huh? – J. Walker Jul 28 '12 at 22:21
It happens to me a lot in sound as well; for example, after sounding out the word "loud" the other day, even though i knew it was right, it sounded like it wasn't a word and it was pronounced wrong. Strange... – Ian Sep 14 '12 at 20:14
up vote 154 down vote accepted

Eureka! Ok, so it's not a single word, but it's what I was trying to think of:

Semantic Satiation

Edit: Found a languagehat discussion on this topic.

share|improve this answer
+1: And how in the hell did you find that explanation? – Robusto Dec 3 '10 at 20:51
@Robusto: basically, it was a matter of knowing the phrase exists (dammit), and then trying various search terms in Google. – Marthaª Dec 3 '10 at 21:05
This seems very close, but according to the linked article, this is when repetition of the word causes disassociation of the word with its meaning. I think the question is about a related yet distinct phenomenon, where intense scrutiny (could be repetition, I suppose) causes disassociation of the written form of the word with the oral form (and possibly the meaning). I'm still voting this answer up though, because this term is so close and a pretty fantastic answer in any case. – PeterL Dec 4 '10 at 0:36
@Peter Leppert, I noticed that too, but no amount of further searching has revealed an alternative term with a meaning specific to reading (as opposed to saying/hearing). On the other hand, I think the phrase semantic satiation is flexible enough to allow both meanings. – Marthaª Dec 4 '10 at 0:43
I'd think that for the brain, repeating and intense scrutiny of a word triggers the same responses (probably causes the same stream of repeated stimuli of the same word/phrase, to the language center). Most of our senses work this way, repeated or constant stimuli causes the signal to decrease, if you stare at a fixed point long enough your field of vision starts to fade to gray, and if you sit in a room with a constant noise, it eventually disappears from your conciousness. This is probably true for higher level concepts too. – Stein G. Strindhaug Mar 21 '11 at 13:48

Based on this NGram... .. ...I'm tempted to suggest semantic satiation is a 'failed coinage'.

Personally I think it's misleading to imply the phenomenon is restricted to the issue of semantics in the first place. In my experience it's not so much that the word 'loses its meaning'. It's more a matter of saying that almost any word tends to become 'unusual' if you concentrate on it too long, even while you remain perfectly well aware of what the word actually means.

So given that Leon Jakobovits James's 1962 coinage doesn't exactly seem to have taken off (many of the later usages being simply references to his anyway), I think it would be better to call it

lexical fatigue (or saturation, as used in olfactory/auditory/visual contexts).

This at least has the benefit of making it clear that it's caused by form of the word itself, not the meaning (which may not even be particularly involved).

share|improve this answer
Then again, maybe it means that semantic satiation as a concept is becoming obsolete... – Daniel Sep 27 '11 at 23:51
@Fumble (a great insight) .. what happened is, people said the term over and over and over and then ........... – Joe Blow Sep 13 '14 at 11:09
Regarding "another coinage". "satiation" is wrong in "semantic satiation" because the effect you're referring to is not the satiation but that surprising "we all know that" effect which happens AFTER "satiation". So a better term is "semantic collapse" or a description "post-repetition semantic collapse" or perhaps "post semantic-overload semantic-collapse". regarding "lexical fatigue" I like it, but I wonder if ... lexical collapse is not more obvious and jingly? ("semantic collapse" is also not bad, and gives a nod to the academic who originally tried and failed to coin a term :) ) – Joe Blow Sep 14 '14 at 7:08
Further: I think "word fatigue" is, perhaps, the very best term. (indeed for me it is not really that the "meaning" (semantics) collapses - it's more like the word "becomes 'weird'". I personally would use word fatigue, or word saturation or perhaps best word collapse to describe the phenom. (You could say, using "semantic!" is an attempt to be scientific and specific, but in fact, it doesn't actually particularly capture what happens. Example: many report the "spelling becomes weird", they still "know what an orange is". So, "word collapse" is more general and correct.) – Joe Blow Sep 14 '14 at 7:10

Based on Martha's accepted answer, I offer:

Orthographic Incredulity

share|improve this answer
You nicely camouflaged your answer's being two separate links! +1 – Cerberus Mar 16 '11 at 18:51

The article on semantic satiation led me to the French term jamais vu, which I think I like better for a couple reasons. It seems to apply better to the written form as described in the original question, and also I find it more fun to say.

share|improve this answer
It's a great point that it is very similar or close to jamais vu. In fact, given @FumbleFingers astute objections to "semantic satiation", this is, indeed, the only actual answer forwarded on this whole page, and, it's a very good answer. Thank you! – Joe Blow Sep 13 '14 at 11:13
Thanks, @JoeBlow! – Matt Sep 14 '14 at 5:56
+1 I think you're right. Semantic Satiation sounds like it has more to do with meaning. The sensation that I think the OP is referring to (that I have had before) is more related to just the look of the word. I continue to know what it means. It just looks wrong. – David Woods Jan 19 '15 at 17:46

This is probably a self-induced form of aphasia or dysphasia.

share|improve this answer

This is a fantastic question. I have often experienced that feeling. I doubt that there is a succinct word or phrase to describe it. I suggest you coin your own word and use it all over the place until it finds its way into a dictionary.

In general, when you say or look at a word too many times /too long the word loses the affiliation it has with its meaning. It starts to be nothing more than a group of noises coming out of your voice-box or a collection of alphabets arranged on a page. I had someone once describe the feeling to me as word-dissolution because to him the word simply dissolved. The brain has already understood and processed the word. Now it knows everything there is to know about the word, and has moved on.

share|improve this answer
I'm convinced that there is a word (or perhaps it's a phrase) that means exactly this, and I've read about it before, but I can't currently find it for the life of me. – Marthaª Dec 3 '10 at 20:00
@Martha, If I had more reputation I'd vote-up your answer! – S Red Dec 3 '10 at 20:55
-1 Not An Answer – FumbleFingers Jul 18 '12 at 23:59
I agree completely this is a fantastic question. Certain words, if you say them over and over, they become really "weird"! For sure. – Joe Blow Sep 13 '14 at 11:08

I looked at the Wikipedia link that was in @Martha's post and it happened to list many names for this phenomenon besides the most popular one, "semantic satiation":

  1. "cortical inhibition"
  2. "reactive inhibition"
  3. "verbal transformation"
  4. "refractory phase and mental fatigue"

The link also describes essays and dissertations in which these terms are used.

share|improve this answer

"Orthographic cognitive dissonance" might work. The conflicting ideas held simultaneously being that the word you're looking at is spelled correctly and that it's spelled incorrectly.

share|improve this answer

What do you think of "lexical overexposure"?

I'm pretty sure that no such word already exists in English. You'll probably have to coin a phrase. "Lexical [something]" to be sure. :)

share|improve this answer

protected by RegDwigнt Feb 7 '12 at 17:25

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.