Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the opposite of the adjective deaf?

e.g.

The seats close to the interpreter are reserved for the hearing impaired. It is imperative that all [not deaf] people sit in the remaining seats.

share|improve this question
    
all not deaf people => everyone who can hear? –  Matt Эллен Mar 13 '12 at 14:39
    
@Matt Yes, that's right. –  Urbycoz Mar 13 '12 at 15:23
1  
Please use "interpreter" instead of "signer". Additionally, you might want to say "are reserved for the hearing impaired." Not all people needing a sign-language interpreter are deaf. –  zzzzBov Mar 13 '12 at 18:20
2  
@zzzzBov: But people who are culturally Deaf usually prefer to identify as Deaf instead of "hearing impaired." It really depends on the audience, but it can be important to distinguish between people who are medically deaf versus those who consider themselves deaf. Generally, people who identify as "hearing impaired" tend to be more orally-oriented and are less likely to be using sign language in the first place. –  Daniel Pryden Mar 13 '12 at 19:47
    
I'm a bit concerned people are taking issue with the political correctness of my example text. It is not a real sign. I was only using it to make my point clear. Nevertheless, I have altered it as suggested. –  Urbycoz Mar 14 '12 at 8:44
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 28 down vote accepted

Hearing persons should cover it.

share|improve this answer
10  
+1: "hearing" is the word Deaf people use to refer to people who are not deaf. –  Daniel Pryden Mar 13 '12 at 19:49
3  
"hearing" ... the "persons" is implied since it is a substantive, adjectival participle –  swasheck Mar 13 '12 at 21:27
add comment

The seats close to the signer are reserved for deaf people. It is imperative that all [not deaf] people sit in the remaining seats. might best be replaced with The seats with a clear view [1] of the ASL [2] interpreter are reserved for those who are reading the interpreter's signing [3]. Others are asked to sit elsewhere. After all, [1] visibility, not proximity, is the essential need; [2] not all deaf or hearing-impaired people know ASL, and not all people who know a sign language know ASL; and [3] some people with no hearing impairment know ASL, and like to read it when they have the chance. No reference to hearing impairment need appear in this notice.

share|improve this answer
1  
excellent point. Unfortunately not really the specific question. But a good answer. –  Michael Durrant Mar 14 '12 at 6:50
add comment

people possessing aural capability should work fine.

share|improve this answer
3  
people would see that and say huh? :) –  Michael Durrant Mar 14 '12 at 6:50
    
People can be very stupid. –  5arx Jul 20 '12 at 19:58
add comment

How about good old "not deaf"?

share|improve this answer
add comment

protected by RegDwigнt Mar 14 '12 at 22:07

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.