English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I read somewhere that the prefix be- can be used as a causative and this got me thinking. Does this mean that because means to cause to cause or to make cause?

share|improve this question
Here's a good summary of the main different meanings of be- as a prefix. 1) thoroughly (bespeckled), 2) to cause to seem (belittle), 3) to provide with (beloved). But as the answers indicate, because doesn't use this prefix - it's by-. – FumbleFingers Mar 13 '12 at 2:35

From OED (the other one):


c.1300, bi cause "by cause," modeled on Fr. par cause. Originally a phrase, often followed by a subordinate clause introduced by that or why. One word from c.1400. As an adverb from late 14c.

share|improve this answer
Thankyou very much for this. I have also just thought of the words 'bemoan' and 'befall'. do these therefore their meanings as by moan(ing) or by fall(ing) have? – MattyBeales Mar 12 '12 at 23:52
bemoan comes from Old English 'to bemoan, wail, lament'. befall comes from Old English 'to deprive of; fall to, be assigned to' but also from from befall, and befall from be- "by, about" + feallan (see fall). – cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Mar 13 '12 at 0:11

The word 'because' originated from 'bi cause' or 'by cause' and not be-cause. So because does not mean to cause to cause.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.