Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a synonym of at a time? For example,

Only four controllers can be connected at a time.

share|improve this question
11  
simultaneously? –  Armen Ծիրունյան Feb 28 '12 at 19:14
3  
"at once" could also be used. –  Mark Beadles Feb 28 '12 at 20:37
    
@benregn I'd be interested in your thoughts on my answer and the comment on it. –  ErikE Mar 1 '12 at 23:07
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Simultaneously and contemporaneously and are both viable options.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, but I would have put them the other way around - contemporaneously is very definitely "second choice" for almost all contexts. –  FumbleFingers Feb 28 '12 at 19:44
    
@FumbleFingers I wanted to put contemporaneously first because I actually dug that one up. –  Mahnax Feb 28 '12 at 19:46
    
You must do as you please, but by convention reference sources (and by implication, ELU) normally put the most relevant information first. There are lots of non-native speakers here - they'll naturally assume the first word is first choice, and some of them may thereby "learn" things they really didn't want to know. –  FumbleFingers Feb 28 '12 at 19:58
1  
@FumbleFingers That makes sense, I'll edit. –  Mahnax Feb 28 '12 at 19:59
    
haha - I would upvote you again for that, if the system allowed me! –  FumbleFingers Feb 28 '12 at 20:05
show 1 more comment

Concurrently would also be acceptable.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you type in "at the same time" at the onelook.com reverse-dictionary, you may find the first seven entries (1. synchronize; 2. synchronous; 3. contemporary; 4. simultaneous; 5. concurrent; 6. contemporaneous; 7. coeval) relevant. Most of the higher-numbered entries that seem relevant are adjectival or adverbial forms redundant with those, except for 17. coincidental and 32. coexistent. Some obscure or less-relevant terms are 47. abreast; 52. monochronic; 94. tautochronous; 108. isochronous; 118. commorient (dying at the same time); 138. coextensive; 144. coetaneous; 150. connascent (born at the same time); 182. synchronoptic (seen at the same time by one person).

share|improve this answer
    
+1 Excellent find; perfect reference. Need to post this on meta for the benefit of all those who ask 'What is a general reference question?' –  Kris Feb 29 '12 at 6:17
1  
@Kris, I agree that the reverse-dictionary makes the current question practically general reference. By the way, reverse-dictionary only ranks as answer #12 for question 1482 - vote it up :). –  jwpat7 Feb 29 '12 at 7:33
    
Thanks, voted up the answer and the great question itself. –  Kris Mar 1 '12 at 10:25
add comment
  • at once
  • together
  • or nothing: "Only four controllers can be connected." It's not World of Warcraft where the port becomes soul-bound (controller-bound) and can never have a different controller connected there ever again.
  • or rephrase: "The device supports four controllers." No further elaboration is needed.
share|improve this answer
    
The last option is not valid. It does need elaboration or could mean '...but not all at the same time.' –  Kris Feb 29 '12 at 6:18
    
First, the OP gave no context to be able to understand the larger meaning. So within the given parameters, I think it's a great suggestion. Second, what in the world are you talking about? Name one example of something that accepts four controllers "but not all at the same time." My examples are: The car can take 4 tires. The toaster can toast 4 pieces of bread. The USB port can accept 4 devices. Looking forward to it. –  ErikE Feb 29 '12 at 7:22
1  
My car has 2 electronic keys, it recognized who is driving by the key that is inserted- It accepts 2 keys, but not at the same time. –  Jim Feb 29 '12 at 7:40
    
@jim But those are named instances. It's not that it accepts any 2 keys; there ARE only two, and just one keyhole. I am sure "4 controllers" is not definite like keys. The very point I made in my post. Try again? –  ErikE Feb 29 '12 at 16:59
    
Actually I tried to make my example one of specific instances and not just any two because if it accepts any controller then you cannot justify specifying a limit of 4. Consider the copy machine we had at my first job- The copy machine required a counter module to be inserted before it could be used. Each department had its own. Only modules with the correct encoding would work- i.e., you couldn't bring in a counterfeit module and make copies. Given that we had 4 depts, it could be said there were only 4 modules the machine would accept and they could only be used one at a time. –  Jim Feb 29 '12 at 17:41
show 6 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.