English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it grammatically correct to use in a publication, that something is (a) 'much better' way of doing something?

share|improve this question
Why do you think it might be wrong? Explaining that would be a much better way of framing the question than what you have done. – slim Feb 24 '12 at 10:23
Seems like general reference to me. – FumbleFingers Feb 24 '12 at 14:33
I suggest you ask instead whether "much better" is appropriate in a formal written style. It's not a question of grammar, nor strictly of spoken versus written language--many publications use relatively informal language. But if you did ask this, it might be better if you gave an example context. – snailplane May 11 '14 at 12:57
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes it is.

Writing or speaking, simple words can be much better than complex ones. They are more accessible, more readily understood, and less at risk of seeming pretentious.

share|improve this answer

There's nothing wrong, but here's what I would do:

  • verbal: much better, slightly better
  • written: significantly better, marginally better
share|improve this answer

Better is a comparative degree of good and best... Then why is it necessary to use much? Better says all... Then why should it be included redundantly?

share|improve this answer
Better is more that good, however sometimes we need to quantify that also relatively. Like much better, somewhat better etc – Panther Apr 20 '15 at 5:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.