Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

"Jim and John have strong right arms."

I believe the usage of plural form of "arm" here is correct. Now, I am confused about we should use singular or plural form of "digit" in the following sentence.

"All multiples of 10 have 0 as their units digits."

How about this?

"All even numbers have even units digits."

Also, please explain the grammar rule along with the answer.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

You should use singular in this case.

There is only one units digit in each multiple, and it is 0.

Much the same can be accomplished in any complex network:

  • Everyone in our branch offices has an accountant as a supervisor.
  • All the people in our branch offices have an accountant as a supervisor.

The difference between the singular has and plural have is because every is singular, while all is plural (I don't make up these rules). But there is only one supervisor in each case, and it's an accountant who's the supervisor.

share|improve this answer
    
Hmm. I'm not quite sure how universal the "rule" is here. "All right-handed weight-lifters have strong right arms" sounds fine to me, as so does "...have a strong right arm". But "Tom, Dick, and Harry all have a strong right arm" sounds somewhat more "iffy", and "Tom, Dick, and Harry all have a sharp mind" sounds far worse. I doubt the singular is always even "non-preferred". I actually lean towards "Tom, Dick, and Harry all have a vested interest" regardless of whether they have the same vested interest or each has a different one. –  FumbleFingers Feb 23 '12 at 16:46
    
@JohnLawler In that case why do we say, "Jim and John have strong right arms" even though there is only one right arm in each person? –  Lone Learner Feb 23 '12 at 17:11
    
It's not the same arm. One is Jim's and the other is John's; they're both strong, but they're not identical. –  John Lawler Feb 23 '12 at 18:21
    
@JohnLawler Similarly all multiples of 10 have their own units digits. One is 10's, the other is 20's, and so on. They're all 0 but they could have been different if we were not talking about multiples of 10 only. For example, "The units digits of 15 and 20 are 5 and 0, respectively." Why can't we then say, "The units digits of 10 and 20 are 0 and 0 respectively."? If we can say this, we should also be able to say, "All multiples of 10 have 0s as their units digits." –  Lone Learner Feb 24 '12 at 8:19
1  
It's, as always, a question of how to rationalize what sounds right to a native speaker, using terminology and rules on which few agree. If you can do that, you should think about running for public office. –  John Lawler Feb 24 '12 at 15:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.