English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Say company A bought company B, is there a pair of antonyms to refer A and B? E.g. merger and mergee (I know this pair is not right, only try to make a point here)

share|improve this question
Purchaser and purchased. Though a lot depends on how the transaction was achieved (cash, stock transfer, etc.) – John Lawler Feb 22 '12 at 3:53

As I see it, the premise is flawed. Merger is not in the same class as acquisition for this purpose.

In a merger, both the parties are merging into one unit. There can be no "merger" or "mergee" in the sense of a party to the merger. You can only have the "companies" in the merger.

In an acquisition, one party acquires another. You therefore, have an acquiring company and an acquired company (the acquirer and the acquired, if you like).

However, the exact legal terms as defined in company law may differ from country to country -- you may need to check that out.

share|improve this answer

I'd go for the acquirer and acquiree (which latter has 23,900 written instances in Google Books).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.