English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Difference between “due to” and “thanks to”

Looks like "due to" usually has negative connotation - a plane crashed due to fog, unemployment increases due to automation, etc.

Suppose I want to say "Thanks to this very cool technology everyone wins" - can I use "due to" in place of "thanks to" or does "due to" always mean some negative attribution?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt Feb 20 '12 at 12:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
The proposed duplicate is not a duplicate. This is a much more specific question. The "duplicate" is about general interchangeability, while this is specifically about connotation. It just so happens that the answer to the general question contains an answer to this one. – kdbanman Dec 14 '15 at 21:32

I don't think "due to" has any negative connotations. It can be used positively or negatively.

In your sentence, "Due to..." would be as appropriate as "Thanks to..."

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.