English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Like the title may already suggest, I am wondering if "so" or "nor" would be right in place for refering that something is (not) like stated in the main sentence. What do you think?

share|improve this question
I'd say never, never use this construction. Whether you use so or nor, it remains not only incomprehensible but misleading to the average English reader. – Kris Feb 13 '12 at 10:54
Nothing lasts forever, and neither do we. – Peter Shor Feb 13 '12 at 12:13
I Am America (And So Can You!) – Robusto Feb 13 '12 at 14:02
@Peter Shor: Even neither seems a bit odd to me, since if nothing lasts forever, by implication everything is ephemeral. I don't think you can say "Everything has property X, and so does [something which by implication wasn't included in that preceding everything]" – FumbleFingers Feb 13 '12 at 16:36
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Both alternatives are actually possible, depending on what you want to say. The sentence is ambiguous and therefore it's very difficult to tell what you're going after.

If you say:

Nothing lasts forever and so do we.

You mean:

Nothing lasts forever and we also last forever => We are immortal.

If you say:

Nothing lasts forever and neither do we.

You mean:

Nothing lasts forever and we don't last forever => We will die one day.

share|improve this answer
Thank you for pointing this out, now I see. – Shrooms Feb 13 '12 at 10:17
I just hope others are going to agree with me, because this is a very tough situation you've proposed. You should probably un-accept my answer and wait for others to up-vote or down-vote or propose their ideas. – RiMMER Feb 13 '12 at 10:25
@DavidWallace: well, this is a confusing situation and I don't mean to argue, because now I'm even more confused than ever. Do you think that "nothing does ..." should be followed by "nor do ..." to continue expressing the negativity? – RiMMER Feb 13 '12 at 10:32
Diamonds last forever and so do we? Neither we nor anything else lasts forever – mplungjan Feb 13 '12 at 10:47
No, this is wrong. You can't use "so do we" after nothing, for either meaning. I think what you want is "nothing lasts forever and neither do we." – Peter Shor Feb 13 '12 at 12:12

"Nothing lasts forever and so do we." would mean Nothing and we last forever which might make sense if the we here is immortal. Maybe if you had a god say it.

Reminds me of the joke:
Villain: Nobody can stop me!
Loser guy turned hero: I am nobody.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.