Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What's the difference between "shrouded with" and "covered with"? Any different hues of meaning here?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The difference is largely one of connotation. The verb to shroud derives from the noun shroud, which typically refers to a sheet used to cover the dead for burial in some religious traditions. Because of this association, when you say that something is shrouded with or shrouded in, it connotes an atmosphere of mystery, gloom, or the numinous.

Shrouded in also lends itself more readily to metaphorical usages. You might say that "The castle was shrouded in mist", but it would sound odd to say that "The castle was covered in mist".

share|improve this answer
    
WOW!!! Thank you very much, JSBangs, for this insight! It really answers my question. –  brilliant Nov 28 '10 at 15:29
    
Additional note: becuase of the connotation of mystery, shrouded also frequently implies 'hidden by'. I might say something was covered with a tarpaulin, but I would be likely to say 'shrouded with' only if it was a camouflage pattern. –  Tynam May 25 '12 at 14:17

protected by RegDwigнt Mar 11 '12 at 20:25

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.