Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there a word or phrase to describe someone who is willing to do extra work in the short term to avoid work in the long run? I have seen "lazy" used for this, but I'd like to know if there's a more precise term.

share|improve this question
1  
Efficient, calculating, far-seeing? How about just intelligent? –  FumbleFingers Feb 6 '12 at 3:49
    
Forward-thinking? –  Urbycoz Feb 6 '12 at 8:34

5 Answers 5

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Well, that's what software engineering/architecture/development is all about. And it's not about laziness, its about efficiency. Maintenance costs grow exponentially (in time, effort and money) when the base is poorly designed. The more money or effort you spend on the early stages of any development project, the more money squared you save in maintenance costs. I've seen tons of software projects to turn unprofitable because of lousy architectures, just because the project started as a quick fix after quick fix. It gets to a point where the project needs to be blown up and started from scratch, or be prepared to waste lots of money on maintenance.

As for a term for this concept, maybe long-term laziness (kind of a humorous term) (good design, low maintenance costs) compared to short-term laziness (poor design, extremely high maintenance costs).

I'm personally very lazy in nature, and that's why I work so hard when programming. I don't like to do things twice, and that's why I try to do them right from the beginning, even if it implies much more effort. I know that extra work will eventually pay off, and will let me lay on my back afterwards, or at least do the required work with minimum effort. Maybe plain oldsmartness, being smart, being time-smart or being effort-smart would do the trick.

Long-term effort minimization strategies in any given activity would be another good and general alternative to describe these kind of situations.

share|improve this answer
    
Code Complete uses the term "long-term laziness," and I think that's about as good an endorsement as I'm gonna find. –  Ian Henry Feb 6 '12 at 16:02
3  
Reminds me of the saying, "There's never time to do it right, but there's always time to do it over." –  Hexagon Tiling Feb 10 '12 at 23:17

The closest I can think of is LANGUOR, defined (also) as 'a relaxed comfortable feeling'. I also do not think LAZY is altogether a negative word, having regularly come across 'lazy elegance' to describe Inzamam ul-Haq (Pak cricketer).

share|improve this answer
    
Reminds me of the book title "Leisure: The Basis of Culture". –  Hexagon Tiling Feb 10 '12 at 23:18

It's a cliche that conjures up images of Dilbert's pointy-haired manager, but you could say that somebody works smarter, not harder.

Edit: Efficient is a broader term than what you describe, but in the right context would meet your needs. Perhaps efficiency gained through foresight?

share|improve this answer

Lazy isn't necessarily a derogatory term. Those of us who practice the behaviour you mention often refer to ourselves as lazy, and mean it in a positive way. "If you want a job done right, give it to a lazy man", someone once told me! :)

You might be looking for a word like "pragmatic", though that's not really related to lazy at all -- it just fits well in the sense of "he has a very pragmatic approach", which can imply that he doesn't do a sloppy job now that would require re-work later. That's not the real meaning of pragmatic, either, but it could be used that way.

"Thoughtfully precise" is probably too verbose, but gives the right idea.

In writing, you might say someone was "concise." I'm not sure if that applies to actions. "He is a very concise programmer"...? Maybe.

If you're just trying to convey the idea, it might be best to spell out exactly what you mean. "He is very good at getting to the core of the problem and focusing on only that which needs to be done. He doesn't try to slop-together half a solution, thus generating more work for his future self."

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.