English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm almost sure it's 36 thousands, since we're talking about 36 not 1. But I'm in doubt because 36 already indicates that it's more than 1, so maybe, just maybe, it could be 36 thousand?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Rathony, Nathaniel, Roaring Fish, Kristina Lopez, tchrist Dec 22 '15 at 21:46

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
Related:english.stackexchange.com/q/54828/8019 – TimLymington Feb 4 '12 at 11:26
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Oh, The grand old Duke of York,
He had ten thousand men;
He marched them up to the top of the hill,
And he marched them down again.

You can have thousands of soldiers, but when you are being exact, you have n thousand of them. same for hundreds, dozens or millions.

share|improve this answer
2  
I am annoyed at the fact that Microsoft Word didn't correct me on this one. I'm a software developer and I have no idea how they let something as simple as this slide. Shame on them ::- ). Also, thanks on you. – Axonn Feb 3 '12 at 23:04

To explain a bit: the word 'thousand' is part of the number, which is modifying the noun (whatever it is that you're counting). Because the number is greater than 1, the noun takes the plural form, but the number itself does not change form. Would you say "sixteens men" because sixteen is greater than one? I certainly hope not. "Sixteen thousand" is still a number, just like "sixteen" is; just because it's expressed in two words doesn't make you treat the individual words differently.

share|improve this answer
    
A good and valuable explanation. +1 and +thank you ::- D. – Axonn Feb 4 '12 at 23:26

36 Thousand.

If it were some other noun, i.e. not just a number, then perhaps thousands would be appropriate — e.g. 36 pots of 'hundreds and thousands'.

But otherwise, thousand is the norm.

share|improve this answer

It's 36 thousand, because that is the naming convention in our number system. We do not say "two hundreds;" rather we say "two hundred."

share|improve this answer

When number + thousand precedes a noun (e.g. Dollar, Rupee or Taka), it already acts as a compound adjective which cannot take plural 's'... but when it doesn't work attributively, it's of hazy currency in south Asia: d govt. Sanctioned a bill of 50 crores/ laks/ thousands (besides crore/lak/thousand)

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.