English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am aware of the difference between content and contents and usually the distinction is clear to me. However I am wondering whether file content or file contents is more correct. On the one hand, the content of a file is a finite sequence of bytes, hence contents would be appropriate. On the other hand, those bytes represent some entity (an image, for example), to which I would refer as the file's content. Is this distinction correct, or am I complicating things too much?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

You are correct. "Content" (without the S) implies there's some kind of meaning; not just a string of bytes. If you refer to thefreedictionary.com, the first definition that's NOT shown as synonymous with "contents" is "the substantive or meaningful part"; which in this case is the entity represented by the bytes.

share|improve this answer

The general usage is File contents (when referring to something contained)

Google Ngram also shows that File contents has an edge over file content

Google Ngram

share|improve this answer
Sir, didn't knew about google Ngram thats really awesome thing to know. Thanks! – stringparser Nov 28 '15 at 19:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.