English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a difference between "convenient for you" and "convenient to you"? And if it is, could you explain it?

share|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

As well as the most common sense of convenient (i.e. suiting you, not causing you time or trouble), there is the related sense of close, near-by, as in "We stopped at a convenient gas-station" or "He picked up a convenient rock". While the phrase convenient for you is much the more common of the two, it could be that convenient to you is more likely to be used with this second sense.

Here are some examples from a quick search:

  • Call the office most convenient to you.
  • Choose a venue convenient to you.
  • Kindly select a branch convenient to you.
  • Visit our contact page to find a location that is convenient to you.
  • Find a kitchen centre most convenient to you.
share|improve this answer
Great! Thank you! Very clear explanation. – Anton Moiseev Jan 29 '12 at 13:55
I dispute that "for you" is more common. This appears to be true when comparing the two three-word phrases on NGram, but that will include irrelevant things like "It will be convenient for you to [do something]", where there's an implied "convenient to us". But "a time convenient to you" is more common than "a time convenient for you", and I don't think there will be many "false positives" with that wording – FumbleFingers Jan 29 '12 at 16:41
The impersonal expression it is convenient for you is 10 times more common (151,000) in Bing than it is convenient to you (15,000). The corresponding negative expressions have similar proportions: for - 4,000 as against to - a mere 13. However, when convenient is preceded by a noun, the reverse seems to be the case, although the numbers are much closer together. Location, date, time + convenient + to are more common than the same expressions with for. So in general it seems that to is much more likely with convenient following a noun than in an impersonal expression. – Shoe Jan 29 '12 at 17:10
Interestingly, though, a place convenient for you is 4 times more common than a place convenient to you. – Shoe Jan 29 '12 at 17:12

While Answer 1 is the correct choice when the word "convenient' is related to location, using the word to doesn't apply as absolutely when the meeting's time is under negotiation.

To illustrate:

It works to say "convenient to you," when you're suggesting that a location can be reached with little effort, like "near to you" or "next to you." This ruling is reinforced by the impossibility of saying "near for you" or "next for you."

But if the matter of discussion is an activity where time is the dominant question it offers enhanced clarity to suggest that to someone that they join in at a time that is more "convenient for you," even though to is technically OK.

share|improve this answer

I've done some research on this one, too, because both sound right, but according to an English teacher, who is also a Youtuber, you use 'to you' in reference to a location, whereas 'for you' is for the benefit as a result.

Talking to you is saying something to you, while talking for you is talking on behalf of you.

You can actually search for it in Youtube. I hope this helps.

share|improve this answer
Hi, Lorane. welcome to EL&U. Your answer has already been posted by another user and doesn't provide any additional information. Please take the tour and visit our help center for additional guidance. Why not answer other new questions? – Rathony Jan 16 at 14:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.