English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

You can say not used any more just as readily as not used any longer, but it is no more used seems quite wrong compared to it is no longer used. Why?

share|improve this question
Though no more <v; pt> is found in writing, logic would suggest that no longer is more appropriate considering the reference is to time. You could say 'It takes longer to do', but in 'It takes more to do', it could be more time or likely, more effort. – Kris Jan 18 '12 at 7:48
No more used sounds a bit weird to me. Better, but a bit archaic/dated would be used no more if we have to stick with those three words. No longer used is standard phrasing. – FumbleFingers Jan 18 '12 at 14:34

For the sense "not used anymore", one could say "It is used no more". ngrams for no longer used,used no more,not used any more,not used anymore,not used any longer [listed in descending order of frequency and shown in first figure below] shows that usage of no longer used has increased substantially in the last 200 years or so. Looking closer at ngrams for the latter four terms [as in second figure] shows used no more still ahead of the other three; and in the last 15 years, not used anymore has overtaken not used any more.

Looking at book links from the second ngrams, one will see frequent usage in the 1800's of no more used, in just the way that you suggest seems wrong. Most of the more-recent instances of the phrase in the links are artifactual (e.g.: "...if there are no more used memory blocks..."). Part of the problem with "it is no more used" as you have it above is that it may lead one to expect a comparison that is not forthcoming. Given a comparison, there's no grammatical problem, although phrasing remains clumsy. Example: "Brand B is no more used than is brand A."

1780-2008 1900-2008

share|improve this answer
+1 for flagging up used no more. I'd like to give you another +1 for what look like well-chosen and informative charts! – FumbleFingers Jan 18 '12 at 14:36
Any more (and any longer, any wider, etc, because of the any) are Negative Polarity Items which require a negative trigger of some sort. In no more, no longer, etc. the negative is combined with the NPI quantifier any, producing no, which has quite different syntax from not...any. One can't substitute one phrase for another in just any context. – John Lawler Jan 18 '12 at 17:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.