Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is correct:

"…that enriches people's everyday life"

or

"…that enrich people's everyday life"

Thanks!

share|improve this question
    
That is a pronoun indicating a third person, as it were (i.e. not you or the person you are talking to). So you use the third person form of the verb. –  Matt Эллен Jan 10 '12 at 15:36
2  
The conjugation of enrich can be plural or singular depending on what the thing is (he/she/it enriches or they enrich): Cake that enriches people's everyday life is awesome! or Cakes that enrich people's everyday life are awesome! –  aedia λ Jan 10 '12 at 15:47
    
@aediaλ, that's true. I hadn't thought about it in such a way –  Matt Эллен Jan 10 '12 at 15:49
add comment

closed as not a real question by Matt Эллен, aedia λ, TimLymington, Will Hunting, RegDwigнt Jan 10 '12 at 16:37

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers

Both could be correct, depending on the subject. Is whatever is doing the enriching plural or singular? Either way your verb "to enrich" needs to match. If it's a singular noun, then the verb will need to be singular. If it's a plural noun, same thing.

Two examples:

"The internet is a technology that enriches people's everyday life."

Here technology is singular, thus you would use the form enriches.

What are some other examples of technologies that enrich people's everyday life?

In this sentence I used the plural of technology, technologies, so I use the verb form enrich to match.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The first supposes that what went before is singular. The second supposes that what went before is plural.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.