English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to describe the idea that relative positions in society are meaningless.

So far I've come up with counterculturalism, societal positional nihilism, a 'beatnik'.

I'm sure there is something more concise.

share|improve this question
What's wrong with egalitarianism? – FumbleFingers Jan 8 '12 at 21:28
Yes, it's egalitarianism and it's one of the core concepts from Enlightenment philosophy behind the founding of the US, so I don't think the terms you've come up with quite fit. Unless Thomas Jefferson and his ilk are beatniks. Hmm, Would that make George Washington Dobie Gillis? – Phoenix Jan 8 '12 at 22:02
When you say "meaningless" what exactly are you trying to convey? – MετάEd Jan 9 '12 at 15:54
up vote 6 down vote accepted

"egalitarian" should do the trick.

share|improve this answer

You could also be looking for a classless society, i.e. one where there are no distinctions of relative position.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.