This is the classic usage of neither/nor:
I would neither hide nor run away.
But is the following construction grammatical? (More than two choices, no neither)
I wasn't going to play dead.
I wasn't going to hide.
Nor was I going to run away.
Although the classic rule is to use neither and nor together, Grammar Girl writes:
In your case, you have three options. From the above, it is correct that you don't need to use neither. However, in the same article Grammar Girl writes:
So taking your list as even a single sentence, I think you need to repeat nor. So you could write (note grammar change in the second sentence):
Nor can be used without neither, as in the following sentences:
Where the preceding clause or the preceding sentence is already in the negative, as opposed to a positive one following neither, it is logical to equate it with a neither+[positive]:
neither+[positive] ... nor
[negative] ... nor
I don't know of a proper grammatical explanation of this, though.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?