English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When writing an instruction about connecting to a computer using ssh, telnet, etc., I'm not sure what spacing to use in this familiar spoken phrase:

  • "Log in to host.com"
  • "Log into host.com"
  • "Login to host.com"

Maybe this is entirely subjective or the realm of industry jargon, but I couldn't think of anywhere else to ask. Any insight?

share|improve this question
Using "ssh" or "telnet" as a verb isn't uncommon either. I hear plenty of "I can ssh into my workstation from my home computer." (Not that this addresses the "Log in or login?" question.) – res Nov 19 '10 at 20:53
notaverb.com/login. 'Nuff said. – Marthaª Nov 19 '10 at 21:56
up vote 42 down vote accepted

I would write “Log in to host.com.”

I think that “login” is a noun (as in “login screen”). I would find the words “loginned” and “loginning” awkward.

As for “Log in to host.com” versus “Log into host.com,” I would use the former because I think that “log in” is a fixed phrase. Martha’s answer to another question is also related.

Added: The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) lists 65 occurrences of “log in to” and 58 occurrences of “log into,” both including inflected forms and excluding the Spoken section. (The queries used are [log].[v*] in to and [log].[v*] into.) Since “log in to” is also used in context like “log in to download it,” the actual number of occurrences of “log in to [host]” is slightly smaller than 65. In any case, it suggests that the phrase “log into” is also used commonly, although I am not sure how good it is to use COCA to compare technical terms.

share|improve this answer

The verb is log in.

Log in to host.com

From the Wikipedia page for Login:

Spelling confusion

The verbs are two words: log in and log out, whereas the nouns are login and logout (often used like adjectives in compound nouns).

share|improve this answer
John, that's because "log in" is the phrasal verb with the intended meaning (See dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/log-in-on). "To" in this case is the preposition to connect with the word "host". – b.roth Nov 19 '10 at 19:34
In a sentence like Log in as "admin", you'd never write "*inas" as one word. Same thing with "in" and "to" when they just happen to end up next to each other in a sentence. – Marthaª Nov 19 '10 at 21:53
@Martha: That sounds like a logical explanation, but does not necessarily reflect the reality. It does not explain why some people never write “log inas Administrator” but still write “log into home.com.” I think that the difference is simple: “inas” is not used in any context, but the word “into” exists. – Tsuyoshi Ito Nov 20 '10 at 12:02
@Tsuyoshi Ito, perhaps I wasn't completely clear, but my point is that using "into" in such a case is just as incorrect as using "inas" would be. The fact that people make mistakes doesn't change this. – Marthaª Nov 20 '10 at 16:26
@Martha: That sounds like a pretty prescriptive attitude towards the language. – Tsuyoshi Ito Nov 20 '10 at 16:46
  • Yes, I agree: Use "log in to" as a verb. So use that for giving instructions.
  • "log into" is not terrible, but it doesn't sound as good because it sounds like you're actually going inside something. For example, "I walked into the store."
  • "login" is the noun and adjective form. So you would use that like this: "I programmed the login procedure." Or... "I don't like this app because the login process is very lengthy."

You can also think about each one with the way we stress the different syllables slightly when we're speaking:

  • "log in to host.com" sounds like "log + in + to host.com" (each word is pretty much evenly stressed)
  • "log into host.com" sounds like "log + INto host.com" (the stress is on "in")
  • "login to host.com" sounds like "LOGin + to host.com" (the stress is on "log")
share|improve this answer
I like the "log into" usage. The "going inside something" argument doesn't quite hold up: one can also say, "I walked into a pole, ouch!" – CSJ Dec 13 '14 at 16:19

Given that so much of the web environment isn't being written by writers who care, I'm increasingly seeing 'login' used as a verb. And to be honest, once it's normalised it will be the correct form.

I'm a digital copywriter and have fought this battle on a few occasions. But I've decided to throw in my hand. 'Login to this site'. 'Enter your login details'. Fine, whatever. Is it clear? Absolutely. Only people like us care.

share|improve this answer
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post - you can always comment on your own posts, and once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post. – Josh61 Jun 12 '14 at 5:44
@Josh61: This is an answer, from a descriptionist point of view from someone who deals with this a lot, rather than prescriptionist. – Hugo Jun 12 '14 at 7:25

Ironic that the instruction at the bottom of this page is 'Sign up or login'.

I'm here because I'm torn between log in to and log into and looking for clarification. At this point in time, I suspect the prevailing opinion is correct - that log in to is preferable for purposes of clarity.

However, I don't doubt that we will soon treat the process of logging in as a figurative point of entry, meaning that log into will make full conceptual sense (cf you don't physically delve into a problem or pile into an argument, yet both are correct grammatically because they are semantically [i.e. figuratively]).

share|improve this answer
You're right, it should use the verb "log in". I've reported the problem: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/217201/… – Hugo Jan 23 '14 at 10:51
This has been fixed and will be released soon: meta.stackexchange.com/a/217326/162511 Thanks for pointing it out! – Hugo Jan 24 '14 at 11:28

protected by tchrist Jun 12 '14 at 5:24

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.