Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I can't remember where or how, but I was taught that one can/should omit the post-hyphen (suffix?) part of a word if it is being grouped with another hyphenated word with the same post-hypen portion. For example, this sentence:

Is the project low-budget or high-budget?

Becomes:

Is the project low- or high-budget?

However, I've rarely seen this done by other people, and was wondering if perhaps it's a localized thing. What's the origin of this rule? Is it commonly accepted? Does it have a name?

share|improve this question
    
    
I was never taught that it's required to do this, only that if you do it you have to use the hyphen in both places. (I see a lot of misuses along the lines of "low or high-budget".) –  Monica Cellio Dec 19 '11 at 19:40
    
I think your question is worded slightly better than the duplicate is, and has a slightly more informative answer, but unfortunately there is indeed duplication. –  jwpat7 Dec 19 '11 at 19:53
    
@jwpat7 Yeah, I can't see how this is a dupe myself. The other asks if it's correct, I already know it's correct and none of my three questions are answered by the other. –  Matthew Read Dec 19 '11 at 19:57
1  
@Matthew Read: You've asked four questions here. The first and third (is it localised/is it commonly accepted) are answered by the original. I'll fall off my perch if anyone comes up with a name specifically for discarding a repeating hyphenated element. And as for "origin of this rule?", I honestly see no prospect of anyone even attempting to answer that. –  FumbleFingers Dec 20 '11 at 1:26

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

It's a variety of Conjunction Reduction, used to avoid repeating material that's already been said. In this case, it's morphological instead of syntactic, but it's got the same purpose and works much the same way.

Generally, though, once it's been reduced, there is a preferred order for such oppositional phrases as high- or low-budget; low- or high-budget sounds strange. And they can't get too far from one another, either:

  • *He left the low-, but she picked the high-hanging fruit.

is terrible.

share|improve this answer
2  
+1 for such a terribly-annoying example of going too far. –  FumbleFingers Dec 19 '11 at 19:27
2  
In ‘The Language Instinct’, Steven Pinker points out that front vowels always precede back ones in compounds such as ‘ping-pong’, ‘hip-hop’ and ‘flip-flop’. Something similar may be going on with 'high'/'low'. –  Barrie England Dec 19 '11 at 19:44
1  
Thanks very much. –  Matthew Read Dec 19 '11 at 20:00
    
Oh, it's a lot more complex than Pinker makes out. High vowels precede low, front vowels precede back, and then there are clusters, and the semantics: *hers and his/his and hers, for instance. See Cooper and Ross's "World Order" for the gory details. –  John Lawler Dec 19 '11 at 20:48

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.