English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Examples: I am at a loss who to blame. OR I am at a loss of who to blame. OR I am at a loss on who to blame.

share|improve this question
    
Like both answers, I prefer at a loss as to what to do, but apparently it's far more common to simply omit those extra two words. – FumbleFingers Dec 19 '11 at 15:58
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Rather than [], [of] and [on], I think it should be [as to]:

I am at a loss as to who to blame.

A clearer way might be to say:

I am at a loss to know who to blame.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you very much! – YONG Dec 19 '11 at 12:00

I think to be absolutely correct there should be a preposition, but common usage seems to indicate you can get away without one.

I would tend to say "I am at a loss as to who to blame"

share|improve this answer
3  
The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English gives "at a loss to do sth", which would make "I'm at a loss who to blame" correct, and not only a "get away" thing, wouldn't it ? A google search on "I am at a loss who to" gives lots of hits back. Or could there be a difference between British and American usage? – Laure Dec 19 '11 at 11:37
    
Thank you very much! – YONG Dec 19 '11 at 12:00

simple. at a loss as to WHOM to blame No preposition needed. Ken T. Baxendale prize for English 1955

share|improve this answer
    
I'm curious: what part of speech do you think the "to" in "as to" is, if it's not a preposition? – Marthaª Oct 4 '15 at 15:47

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.