Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been doing some research and experiment with Microsoft software such as SQL Server 2010, SharePoint 2010 and Exchange 2010. Now I have to write a report on what I've done.

I need a proper name to refer to such software as a whole. The first one coming to my mind is production tools. I decide to use this one if no one could come up with a better one for me.

share|improve this question
20  
Do not tempt me! –  JeffSahol Dec 15 '11 at 21:10
2  
Shouldn't you refer to Microsoft for how they would like you to name their stuff? –  Mitch Dec 15 '11 at 21:26
    
@Mitch I assumed I could get a quicker answer here. Plus, I really love this site :) –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 21:35
1  
@JeffSahol How? –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 21:36
3  
'Cause you've worn out all the improper ones? –  mickeyf Dec 15 '11 at 23:39
show 2 more comments

6 Answers 6

up vote 18 down vote accepted

Here I would propose enterprise software. As a marketing buzzword (buzzphrase?) it admittedly has become rather inexact. Nevertheless, it encapsulates what the three examples have in common, aside from their manufacturer: they are "heavy-duty" software products that the typical end user does not interact with directly; they are useful (or cost-effective) only at the enterprise level (i.e. for a large or complex organization). An end user would almost never see screens for managing Exchange, for example. He or she would likely interact with Outlook, and Outlook communicates with and through Exchange. He or she would almost never write or extract data directly from SQL Server, but use another application or website to do so.

Business solutions software is somewhat orthogonal to "enterprise software," since business software would include software aimed at businesses which are too small or simple to require products as heavy as SharePoint or Exchange, and strictly speaking a product like SQL server might be used for production as opposed to business purposes.

I would not use the term productivity software here as it is the least precise. To some extent, all software that is not specifically intended for entertainment (i.e. to kill time) would contribute to productivity (i.e. to save time), including the packages mentioned, but the term is applied to applications used commonly by a variety of workers in a variety of industries to enhance their day-to-day productivity. These would include general office software (e.g. word processors, contact managers) and role- or industry-specific software (e.g. accounting, process management). My smartphone app store has a "productivity" category but it certainly wouldn't be the place to buy SQL Server.

Middleware refers specifically to software that manages interaction between systems. Neither SharePoint nor SQL Server are middleware.

share|improve this answer
2  
By the way what does "orthogonal" mean in your context? Mutually exclusive? Independently of each other? Non-overlapping? –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 21:20
2  
Sorry, I meant that the definition lies across a different, independent axis. That is, in my opinion, comparing "business solutions" and "enterprise software" is like comparing apples and oranges. –  choster Dec 15 '11 at 21:28
    
Thanks for making it clear. –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 21:34
    
The industry acronym is COTS - commercial off the shelf, as opposed to applications written specifically for the task/client –  mgb Dec 15 '11 at 22:59
    
+1 As a software developer, Enterprise Software is the closest phrase I would use for describing the mentioned Microsoft products. –  Tyler K. Dec 16 '11 at 3:11
show 2 more comments

They should be considered as Business Solutions Software, as is evident from the Microsoft website categorization.

share|improve this answer
    
So far, your answer seems to make the most sense to me. –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 20:00
    
I think it works well in your context for a general audience. –  Wudang Dec 15 '11 at 20:21
add comment

Microsoft calls them productivity tools. So do others in my experience. (If this were just a Microsoft question I would call it off-topic, but you seem to be asking more generally.)

(See Google results for "productivity tools microsoft.com".)

share|improve this answer
    
Well, I have to admit Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Office Suite are truly productivity tools. But I doubt the term would apply here. –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 19:45
    
Isn't Exchange part of Office Suite? That's what made me think in this direction. –  Monica Cellio Dec 15 '11 at 19:51
1  
Exchange is server software, OutLook is part of office. –  Matt Эллен Dec 15 '11 at 19:53
add comment

The preferred term for discussing this kind of software tends to change every few years due to marketing pressures. Even though the core functions a business needs remain pretty static, the marketing wonks need a way to make the new versions seem new and exciting compared to the old ones that did pretty much the same thing.

So over the past couple of decades, "back office software", "enterprise software", "business solutions software", and "information systems software" have all had their heyday. And they all remain terms that would be readily recognized by someone familiar with the industry.

I'd tip my hat to either "enterprise software" or the aforementioned by Incognito "business solutions software" as the ones with the most "modern" connotation right now.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Such software is commonly known as a service.

  • SQL Server 2010 is a database service
  • SharePoint 2010 is a SharePoint service
  • Exchange 2010 is an Exchange service or an email service

They are characterised by how they tend to run in the background and are on a central server, not on an individual's computer - although I think SharePoint is the name for the client software as well as the service.

share|improve this answer
    
"service" is an overloaded term on windows. Lots of thiangs run as services that do not offer services in the way these products do. –  Wudang Dec 15 '11 at 20:20
1  
"Software" and "service" are far from synonymous. A "service" is a function or set of functions that need to be performed. "Software" is the practical implementation of one or more services. Even when using the technical connotation of "service" - a constantly-running app providing functionality to other client software - it is not accurate to call any of these products a service. SQL Server, for example, is actually a collection of multiple service daemons (e.g. SQL Server, SQL Server Agent, Distributed Transaction Coordinator) and multiple client tools (e.g. Management Studio). –  Jonathan Van Matre Dec 15 '11 at 21:43
    
Exchange Server and Outlook are a lot more than 'email services'. I'd call them 'groupware'. –  Alan B Dec 16 '11 at 9:28
add comment

Middleware is the term I'd use.

share|improve this answer
    
I just read the wikipedia entry. Application servers could be called middleware, but when we mention middleware in the first place, would my audience immediately understand we are talking about application servers? I guess they would think of something else. –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 19:42
    
Not "servers", "services". –  Wudang Dec 15 '11 at 19:45
    
My point is when we mention the term middleware, would those pieces of Microsoft software come to your mind? –  Terry Li Dec 15 '11 at 19:48
    
Yes, we use the term for all DB software, MQ, IBM WAS, CICS, etc as well as SQL server and share point. I assume Exchange 2010 is the server rather than the client? –  Wudang Dec 15 '11 at 19:51
    
These are not middleware softwares. –  Incognito Dec 15 '11 at 19:51
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.