English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I just want a confirmation because it sounds weird to me... Is the following sentence correct, or is there a better word than "used"?

This picture is used twice in this book.

I can't tell you why but this "used" doesn't seem to be right at all...

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Sounds fine to me. A picture can be used to illustrate a point, or it can be used in the sense that you take someone's work, whether a physical picture or a computer file, and use it in your work.

As to alternatives, you could say "this picture appears twice" or "this picture can be found twice", or something like that.

share|improve this answer

I too feel slightly uncomfortable with "used" here. The only context in which it's valid implies it's not a typesetting mistake (which it probably is). A usage which only makes sense in some unusual context is best avoided.

share|improve this answer

It is correct and acceptable.

You understandably resist it because "used" is so often employed in English as a convenient verb when there is often a more specific verb that will better describe the action. Your discomfort at such linguistic abuse marks you out as someone who understands the language at an intuitive level rather than one who simply parrots phrases.

In this case at least, "used" is probably correct. You could say printed or reproduced, but it all depends on context.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.