Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sentences such as I came across a letter that was typed by her secretary, can be "reduced" by removing that and the auxiliary verb, yielding I came across a letter typed by her secretary. In this particular case, the by phrase, or some other modifying phrase such as that morning or in red ink appears to be obligatory. You can't simply say, *I came across a letter typed, although you can say I came across a typed letter.

In other cases, though, this seems to be OK; consider All the students arrested were from King's College.

In what cases is a dependent required to make the clause grammatical? Can anyone point me to a discussion of this in a reliable reference grammar, preferably the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language? I see it mentioned there on p. 78, but this particular issue is not discussed.

share|improve this question
    
Related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/30223/… –  Cerberus Dec 7 '11 at 17:48
add comment

3 Answers

Note that this pattern also exists for the verb to be: the man who is tall becomes the tall man whereas the man who is in the room becomes the man in the room.

I think the answer to your question lies in the rules for adjectives which follow the nouns that they modify. These reduced adjective clauses are, for all purposes, adjectives themselves and when they are reduced to a single word, they are positioned as a normal adjective, that is before the noun. However they follow the noun when they have more than one word after being reduced, just as with other multiple word adjectives in English (except hyphenated adjectives).

For example, you can't say He has a black as the night soul but you can say He has a soul black as the night. The adjective phrase black as the night follows the noun soul because it is a phrase not a single word.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, but I'm not convinced you can't ever put as "extended ajectival clause" before the noun. Bad example, perhaps, and it does kinda need quote marks, but I don't have a problem with I'd rather buy a "Made in Britain" product. –  FumbleFingers Dec 7 '11 at 19:10
    
That one seems like a bit of a stretch to me. I guess I'd argue that "Made in Britain" acts as a single adjective that modifies the noun. But I'd never use it as you just did. –  SigueSigueBen Dec 7 '11 at 22:50
    
Well, "to die for clothes" gets a lot of google hits. I'm not in the least fashion-concious, but I don't see that one as odd. Although obviously many people do - apart from the ones who put it in quotes as per my first example, quite a few instances feel the need to replace one or both spaces with hyphens. –  FumbleFingers Dec 7 '11 at 23:06
    
It took me a couple of moments to parse to die for clothes as an adjective-noun combination! I agree with you on this one though. To me, it seems acceptable as well. The exceptions aside, I think we can still say that in general non-hyphenated multi-word adjectives follow the noun they modify. –  SigueSigueBen Dec 7 '11 at 23:25
add comment

In both of your sentences, what you have is the passive participle typed, which syntactically functions as a noun modifier. When typed is being used alone, it follows the normal rules for modifier placement and precedes the noun:

I found a typed letter.

However, as a passive participle typed is able to take an adverbial complement that specifies the agent. When this occurs, the entire phrase must then follow the noun.

I found a letter typed by the secretary.

This rule is not unique to passive participles: in general, English requires single-word modifiers to precede a noun, but multi-word modifiers to follow the noun. (The exact rules are fairly complex, but the preceding rule of thumb covers the most common cases.) You can see the same thing with active participles ending in -ing and ordinary adjectives.

I saw a red ball.

I saw a ball red as the rising sun.

I met a dying man.

I met a man dying of AIDS.

I don't have a copy of the CGEL to refer to, but if you look up the section on adjective and adjective phrases I'm sure you'll find a discussion of adjectival word order.

share|improve this answer
    
I object to adjective as a function, (it's a category; the function is modifier) but I take your meaning. –  Brett Reynolds Dec 7 '11 at 17:01
    
@Brett, you're right. I updated the answer to reflect that terminology, since it's more accurate. –  JSBձոգչ Dec 7 '11 at 17:04
    
Repetition of my answer? Ok, so it was formatted nicer. –  SigueSigueBen Dec 7 '11 at 17:46
    
Hang on! What about All the students arrested were from King's College? –  Brett Reynolds Dec 7 '11 at 22:37
    
@Brett, like I said, the full rules are more complex than that. –  JSBձոգչ Dec 8 '11 at 1:06
show 1 more comment

The reason Huddleston and Pullum don’t discuss it is perhaps that it is as at least as much a semantic question as a grammatical one. Typing is a process and, as such, not something you just come across. Moreover, a mundane process such as typing is not one you would normally want to comment on unless you wanted to draw attention to the fact that it was typed by her secretary, or typed that morning or typed in red ink. By contrast, it would be quite reasonable to say I have seen a jet engine assembled because that is something you see rather than come across, and it is sufficiently out of the ordinary to report for its own sake.

share|improve this answer
    
The jet engine assembled example is a different construction. There assembled is a complement of seen, not a modifier of engine. –  Brett Reynolds Dec 7 '11 at 17:00
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.