In English we often say, for example, "he still has a ways to go before he's done." Is this grammatically correct?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
AHD4 has the following entry for ways:
The Usage Note states, in part:
As an idiom, the phrase seems well-established in the United States. As Peter Shor said, Ngram shows evidence of this. The Corpus of Contemporary American English gives me 138 hits for "a ways to go" and 193 for "a way to go". Many of these hits are from published print sources. (In the British National Corpus I get no hits for "a ways to go".)
As a native English speaker, I think "a ways to go" sounds fine.
EDIT: Also, see page 949 of the Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage.
No, it is not grammatically correct - "a" is specifically singular, while "ways" is specifically plural.
(Of course, being grammatically incorrect does not prevent it being in common usage.)
"Ways" is not the plural of "way" but a separate word with its own meaning. "Ways" means "a certain distance, not great, perhaps, but significant"; it is often modified as "a little ways," which makes it mean "a very moderate distance." The distance may be physical or figurative. "Ways" is singular, always seen as "a ways." On this understanding, your usage is grammatically correct.
"A ways" is just how some of us Americans talk and with never a second's doubt. Hear Harvard man EJ Dionne on NPR. Doesn't know any better.
Other Americans talk that way as a joke, to affirm hick roots or to be deliberately rustic as the English commenter notes.
Would one expect more, when some of use plural noun, "savings", as a singular subject? Not when many ads say something like this. "Buy one, get one free! Now that's a savings."
Many do the same with "an Olympics" meaning "games". People who talk that way are not nimble enough to say "these Olympic games" or this "Olympic game series" taking a singular verb because "series" is the subject.
What prompts these solecisms? Local composers of cheap advertisements. NPR announcers, who barring a few, are not all that educated.
For all their loud, hectoring, over-the-top ranters like Limbaugh and Bill Reilly apparently got some education along the way.
protected by tchrist Feb 22 '15 at 4:47
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?