Is it grammatically correct to say have you got paper? Do you have to specify have you got a piece of paper, any paper or some paper or can you just say paper?
|
|
I would say it's not incorrect grammatically speaking, but perhaps imprecise. It would be clearly incorrect to say something like "Have you got pencil?" 'Paper', on the other hand, in the sense you've used it is a mass noun. The usage in English seems a bit murky, but you'd be well understood in a classroom if you asked a child "Have you got paper?" in the same way as if you asked "Have you got money?" |
|||||||||
|
|
Yes, it is grammatical. It shows a use of the zero article, of which the ‘Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English’ says, Zero article phrases commonly express non-specific or generic references. To see that ‘paper’ can occur with a zero article, we need look no further than Lewis Carroll:
|
|||
|
|
|
If somebody went to a store intending to buy some paper, and didn't find any, I wouldn't think there was anything unusual if they asked:
But as the other answers say, in most contexts I would indeed find it unusual. I would expect a question more like:
|
|||
|
|
|
"Have you got paper?" is grammatically correct, but vague. A person could answer in the positive, if they had a single sheet or an entire ream. |
||||
|
|
I see that "have you got paper?" is not the same as ...a piece of paper, ...any paper, or ...some paper. In the first case, I am concerned about paper, (the right kind in the right quantity, which is supposed to be understood) that would serve my purpose. All other forms of the sentence distract (from) the focus. I will be inviting trouble in the form of "I have lots of paper, but sorry no pieces"; "Would any paper really do?"; "How much, according to you, is some paper?" So long as grammar lets me, I will focus on the core idea and leave the peripheral details unsaid. :) |
|||
|
|
