English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When a person talks about something, s/he doesn't get to the point but starts with a pun, intending to let us figure out its purpose.

Someone told me I could use reserved to describe that person, but I checked ODO which says this means slow to reveal emotion or opinions. I guess it's not quite correct here.

Is there any better word for such a person?

share|improve this question
Puns are usually cryptic (especially to people learning a new language), but the speaker may only be attempting to inject some humour. – Randolf Richardson Nov 26 '11 at 2:45
up vote 6 down vote accepted

If he speaks in a way that hides the meaning of his intentions, he is being cryptic. You are right that reserved is not the right word as that would mean he is shy.

share|improve this answer
Though I must admit, I've never encountered a pun I've considered cryptic. They're a bit too silly for that. – onomatomaniak Nov 26 '11 at 8:49

Circumlocutor: literally, one who speaks around. The sense I get from your description is that of someone who is too enamored with his own voice. The deliberate concealing of meaning is esoteric, which one may use as either a verb or a noun. "Obtuse" suggests dense, slightly stupid. I would call this person annoying.

share|improve this answer

I think that's referred to as being obtuse.

share|improve this answer

He sounds to me to be vague and inarticulate.

share|improve this answer
Or a pompous windbag. – Warren P May 25 '13 at 23:51

Speakers who take a long time to get to the point are longwinded. Those who may be briefer, but who are nevertheless dull or insensitive in their expression are, as Hy Libby has suggested, obtuse.

share|improve this answer
I thought that obtuse was more about the difficulty on the listener's part to get the implications, and not about the speaker's inability to explain things well or just general lower intellectual power. – Mitch Jan 21 '12 at 18:12
@Mitch: The OED gives ‘Annoyingly unperceptive or slow to understand; stupid; insensitive. Also, of a remark, action, etc.: exhibiting dullness, stupidity or insensitivity; clumsy, unsubtle.' So even if not of a person, then certainly of what a person says. – Barrie England Jan 21 '12 at 18:29
The context I think of is usually about someone not 'getting an explanation. But I suppose that doesn't prevent it being about someone giving a bad explanation. – Mitch Jan 21 '12 at 18:38

If he's hesitant to state his point out of concern for social repercussions, he may be said to be pussyfooting or beating around the bush.

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Aug 23 '14 at 6:01

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.