English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I wonder about the the <noun> of <noun> template. For example, the customers of a movie theater or the possessor of a car. The question is "Is it a stable rule in English to put "the" before the first noun in this template?" Are there other instances of using this template, but without "the". I often use the structure "It is the <noun> of <noun>." For example, "It is the case of a cruel corruption." I have the same questions for this template.

share|improve this question
It's just a matter of time before someone answers this question. – Mark Peters Nov 25 '11 at 21:54
For all customers of the movie theater doesn't use "the" before the first noun, nor the phrase I am a customer of the theater. – Flimzy Nov 25 '11 at 21:54
I would add, referring to the example given, that the example should read "It is a case of cruel corruption" rather than "It is the case of a cruel corruption" - which seems grammatically incorrect to me...! – user37071 Feb 4 '13 at 17:03

The first noun in the [noun] of [noun] unit is treated as any other noun as regards modifiers, so (barring special cases such as idioms) wherever you would say the [noun1], you can also say the [noun1] of [noun2], etc.

As a corollary, it is also correct to use [noun1] of [noun2] without a the, especially if the wouldn't normally appear before [noun1] alone. Examples:

I drink a cup of coffee every morning.

Strength of will is important in a leader.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.