English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There is a sentence "I am what I do" by Martin Buber, but is there such a sentence as "I do what I am"?

Do both sentences mean the same or is there a difference?

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by RegDwigнt Nov 25 '11 at 10:52

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Both are grammatical, if that's what you mean, but otherwise this is a philosophical question rather than a linguistic one. – Barrie England Nov 25 '11 at 8:31
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Those sentences are not the same.

"I am what I do" means that my personality is determined/can be described by my actions. "I do what I am" means that my actions are determined/can be described by my personality.

Technical speaking, the difference is what is a cause and what is an effect (philosophical concept of casuality). In the first sentence "I" is an effect of my action — "I do". In the second my actions "I do" is an effect of what "I am".

And is there such a phrase? Don't think that it exists in exactly those words. Some of our prominent philosophers, Freud among them, do postulate this same principle though.

share|improve this answer
+1. for the enlightenment. So, technical there is no such phrase "I do what I am" because there is no way that my actions be determined by my personality (or there are such person?) – Larry Morries Nov 25 '11 at 8:44
More like because none thought of putting it in words. I'm no expert on Freud, but as far as I know he tried to explain our every action as being dictated by our personality (or, to be precise, it's unconscious part). – Philoto Nov 25 '11 at 9:46
"I do what I am" is not often used because we assume it to be the case by default. The decisions you make are, by definition, what constitutes your personality. As such, your actions stem directly from your personality, hence "I do what I am". The inverse, "I am what I do", is less of an obvious and implicit case, so it is seen to be a philisophical statement about your behaviour. – Polynomial Nov 25 '11 at 9:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.