English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Would a switch of the word 'assistant' and 'manager' cause differences in a universal corporate context?

In my opinion, assistant manager is just a rank below a manager. This seems to apply to manager assistant.

share|improve this question
see Dwight Schrute and Gareth Keenan for examples of manager's assistants, who are not assistant managers. – Matt E. Эллен Nov 25 '11 at 10:10
up vote 4 down vote accepted

I'm of the opinion that assistant manager is a level below a manager, whereas a manager assistant is an assistant to the manager, and not necessarily just below in level to the manager. Manager assistant seems to be more close to secretary in rank.

share|improve this answer
So the assistant manager is a just a sort of "deputy manager" (if you will) and the manager assistant is reminiscent of a secretary. One is a sub-manager and one is a sidekick? – Rant Nov 26 '11 at 21:09
@Rant Well, that's another way of looking at it. People in different organisations might have different official designations for the same generic post. I'm sure that 'sidekick' wouldn't be an official designation in any sane organisation though! ;) – Ambar Nov 28 '11 at 5:32
As a conclusion, I think Rant's comment have make Ambar answer more brighter. Marked as answer and +1 for Rant. – Larry Morries Nov 29 '11 at 7:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.