English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Are there rules about using “that” to join two clauses?

In the following, does the word "that" belong?

"He said that we should go fishing."

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by RegDwigнt Mar 15 '12 at 23:06

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

up vote 2 down vote accepted

This usage of "that" is correct and belongs.

"That" sets off a dependent clause but could be left off without ambiguity:

He said we should go fishing.

This basically means the same thing and the "that" is implicit: "we should go fishing" acts as a dependent clause, telling us what was said.

share|improve this answer
So it doesn't belong? – Moshe Nov 11 '10 at 2:12
it does belong, and it is grammatical; but you can also leave it out. – Claudiu Nov 11 '10 at 2:58
There's actual a minute difference, but right now I can't remember it. I believe it was to the effect of "that" implying paraphrasing, whereas without it you imply his actual words. – stevendesu Nov 14 '10 at 18:09

The answer to your question is, Yes, it does belong. The use of the word "that" allows the current speaker to paraphrase in general terms what was said whereas leaving "that" off requires a direct quotation.

share|improve this answer
it requires no such thing – Matt E. Эллен Mar 16 '12 at 12:43

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.