A new Victorian-set British novel begins sentences containing h-dropping with lower-case e's, as in " 'e took my money, 'e did." This seems incorrect but I'm at a loss to find the rule.
|
I don't think anybody would ever write
with a small 't' (although sometimes the apostrophe is dropped here). I've checked some websites, and they all use a capital 'T'. And the title of John Ford's play is usually written
with a capital 'T'. So I would say the rule is to capitalize the initial letter even if the sentence starts with an apostrophe. And here is an example from the year 1897 which not only capitalizes the E in 'E, but also capitalizes the A in 'Allelujahs:
The punctuation at the beginning looks a little awkward, with a left quote followed by an apostrophe, but that's the way they did it. |
|||||||
|
|
I would follow the style where capitalisation is done as if the apostrophe is absent and the word begins with the first of the remaining letters.
(examples taken from Larry Trask's Guide to Punctuation) |
|||||
|
|
When it appears in the speech of a character, it just tries to show the accent of the particular character which deviates from the standard British one. There is no rule involved in the language spoken at that time. As to whether this is correct in terms of printing, I think there's nothing wrong with the lower case of the "e" here once the initial letter is dropped; the apostrophe marks the absence of "h". |
|||||||
|
|
Welcome to EL&U. Since the sentence wouldn't begin with a small 'e' in normal prose, there's no reason why it should do so when it replicates speech. The ' stands in place of the missing 'H' at the beginning of the sentence and in place of 'h' before did. Some publishers may choose to print it as 'E took my money, 'e did, but I think there is a stronger argument for the version which you report. |
|||||||||||
|
