Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Both reckless and feckless imply not taking responsibility. When is it appropriate to use the one over the other?

share|improve this question
2  
Are reck and feck synonyms? –  Hugo Nov 4 '11 at 23:17
    
This isn't quite general reference. It's about two similar-sounding words with somewhat similar meanings with a fine shade of difference (covered in some of our answers). It's worth articulating those (fine) differences. –  Tom Au Nov 5 '11 at 17:03

2 Answers 2

They can be synonyms, but note:

feckless means ineffective or having no real worth or purpose; reckless means marked by unthinking boldness or with defiant disregard for danger or consequences

It may help to remember their etymologies:

  • Easy to remember: feck from the Scottish shortened form of effect.
  • Hard to remember: reck from the Old High German to have regard.
share|improve this answer
    
reck as in reckon? doesn't seem so hard to remember... –  Karl Knechtel Nov 5 '11 at 8:05
    
@Karl: Reck and reckon have different etymological roots, different modern meanings. –  Hugo Nov 5 '11 at 8:37
    
@Hugo: I have voted to reopen-- see my comment with regard to the question. I have upvoted your answer because I felt it addressed the question, and am inviting you to join me in voting to reopen. –  Tom Au Nov 5 '11 at 17:04

With regard to "responsibility," fecklessness is a sin of OMISSION, while recklessness is a sin of COMMISSION.

That is "feckless" means not TAKING responsibility, while reckless means being IRresponsible.

share|improve this answer
    
I like the rampant capitalization. –  Mahnax Nov 5 '11 at 0:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.