What’s the rule to decide whether you add -er or whether you add -or when creating a noun from a verb?
Sometimes it’s -er:
- read > reader
- hate > hater
- hit > hitter
But other times it’s -or:
- meditate > meditator
- collect > collector
This has been previously touched on here: “Commentor” vs “Commentator”. I'll try to expand on that.
Both -er and -or are so-called "agent noun suffixes", and Wiktionary has entries for both:
Generally speaking, -er is much more common in English (which should come as no surprise since it has deep Germanic roots, see the link) and can be easily attached to any English verb to form the corresponding noun (drive — driver, run — runner, drink — drinker, etc.).
The suffix -or, on the other hand, comes from Latin, and is used much more seldom, basically where Latin would do it. Just try building the words drivor, runnor or drinkor, and see for yourself. In fact, Wiktionary lists only a handful of terms that were derived using this suffix, such as actor, author and sculptor, and goes on to provide the following usage notes:
Edit: courtesy of Martha, here's a link to a post on the "Separated by a common language" blog that provides further details and addresses the differences between US and UK English:
The best rule I've found?
If you can change the word to have "ion" at the end, it is OR. If you can't, it's ER.
TeachER (can not be teachion) ConductOR (conduction) ProfessOR (profession)
I can't really think of any ER's sorry!
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?