English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm looking for a word to describe languages which are not easy to study or find books about in Western Europe or North America.

On example language, which I'm currently immersed in, is Georgian, with no major related languages and its own alphabet, most people have never heard of it though it is a national language with millions of speakers.

I'm looking for a word that can work OK everywhere, even in the countries where the languages are not in the minority. Georgians for instance are aware most people might not have heard of their language but it's certainly not a minority language in Georgia.

Is "exotic* the right word to use or is there a better one?

Here's some other languages I think of in the same way:

Albanian, Armenian, Burmese, Hungarian, Khmer, Kurdish, Lao, Latvian, Lithuanian, Mongolian, Persian, Sinhala, Tibetan.

(I used the tag "single word requests" because I couldn't find a better one. It doesn't have to be a single word.)

share|improve this question
You might just say lesser-known. Words like exotic and arcane can be construed as mildly offensive. – onomatomaniak Nov 3 '11 at 11:40
"Exotic" can also be construed as complimentary. (-: – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 11:43
@onomatomaniak: I think you could make your comment an answer. – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 12:17
your wish is my command – onomatomaniak Nov 3 '11 at 12:24
Could you give us an exact context (a few sentences) where you want to use the term? I think that matters. – Unreason Nov 3 '11 at 12:38
up vote 12 down vote accepted

You might just say lesser-known. Words like exotic and arcane can be construed as mildly offensive.

Edit: For what it's worth, a quick search reveals that this is actually a category used by the US Library of Congress. I also ran into it on McGill's linguistics website.

share|improve this answer

Exotic, obscure, esoteric and, even the best suggestion imo so far, lesser-known1 all have one problem - they are intrinsically speaking from a western civilization perspective.

Objectively the language is isolated (have no proven connections to other languages), it is also an offspring of one of the world's primary language families.

1 lesser-know is the best since it does have an immediate connotation of: language we know little about. Exotic would be strange, unusual, rare. Obscure is not known and rare. Esoteric is rare and secretive. (Here I have emphasized unwanted connotations.)

share|improve this answer
I would argue that lesser-known is better because it isn't speaking from a western perspective; it's speaking from a numeric perspective. – onomatomaniak Nov 3 '11 at 12:40
@onomatomaniak, I do think your suggestion is the best (pending some clarification from OP); however the question is also what other languages would you put in this category? Does it really describe what OP is after? – Unreason Nov 3 '11 at 12:49
I'll put in a list of other languages I think of in the same way. – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 12:53
Georgian is not an isolate; it just has no major relatives. It is a member of the Kartvelian family, though, which does contain other languages (Svan, Laz, etc.). And the other languages given as examples in the question likewise have genetic relations to other languages, too. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Dec 2 '13 at 10:47
It is'nt wrong for westerners to speak from a western perspective! What else can we do? – kjetil b halvorsen Mar 11 at 14:02

The definition of a world language is well defined, so I postulated "non-world language" and found lots of hits. It's not a great phrase, but it's understood.

share|improve this answer

They are sometimes called minority languages.

share|improve this answer
Hmm in Armenia or Greece or New York, Georgian might be a minority language. But in Georgia it is the majority language. Let me edit my question. – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 11:39
In that case, I don't think there is any specific term. – Barrie England Nov 3 '11 at 11:53
Yes I don't think there's a specific term so I'm just looking for one which will work best. I couldn't find a more appropriate tag than "single word request" though. – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 11:56

Maybe 'Obscure' would work in your context. Or perhaps 'esoteric'. An old and obscure language might be deemed 'archaic'.

share|improve this answer
I wouldn't personally mind being described as "obscure" or "esoteric" but some people might take these terms negatively when applied to their language which they are proud of. – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 12:16
Indeed they might. "[languages] that are little known and little studied but have many speakers?" Somewhat self-contradictory? If a language has many speakers surely it cannot be little known? Or do you mean outside of its native environs? – 5arx Nov 3 '11 at 15:39
Yes obviously little known would not apply to the speakers themselves or even their neighbours, but to the wider world, or "in the west" for instance. Perhaps I'm looking for an antonym of "widely known". – hippietrail Nov 3 '11 at 16:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.