In a bullet list, I want to say there is a point which is "blocking". Is "blocking point" the correct expression or not?
|
|
I would use "sticking point" given the context in your comment, or "bottleneck" if the step is holding things up but not stopping the process entirely. |
|||
|
|
|
Besides using bottleneck or prerequisite from previous answers, saying an item is on a critical path is a possibility. Some words that appear to not quite work due to lack of specificity are essential and critical. |
|||
|
|
|
If you treat a situation as a node and if you treat possible actions in a situation as branches from a node to other nodes, then you could call nodes without any outgoing branches dead ends. To perform an action that leads to a dead end (choosing a branch that leads to a dead end) could be called "to block further actions". You could also define bottlenecks by finding nodes connected by few branches. |
||||
|
|
|
In our IT department we're using "dependency" and "transitive dependency" if we have a hierarchy of prerequisites to a certain point. |
|||
|
|
|
I prefer to use the term "blocker". We use this term where I work. The formal definition of the word supports this usage.
|
|||
|
|
|
I think OP's "bullet list" is actually a "project plan". Critical Path Analysis in this context means establishing the shortest possible time in which the project can be completed. If Subtask-B can't be started until Subtask-A is completed, that's a dependency. But because other subtasks may be progressing in parallel, the elapsed time for the project may not be affected by whether or not there's any delay in starting Subtask-B immediately after Subtask-A is complete. Those dependencies where any delay will affect the overall timescale of the project are called critical activities. |
|||
|
|
