English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would tend to write double-l, but Google gives me more single-l, so I'm guessing it's an Atlantic divide thing.

And I guess all the other *full words.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Mari-Lou A, tchrist, Chenmunka, choster, Ellie Kesselman Jan 4 '15 at 4:12

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

There seems to be a trend of "Is X/Y a British English/American English difference?" questions where X is a word, and Y is a typo. – Seamus Nov 2 '10 at 12:54
(I removed the "single-word-request" tag, because it doesn't seem to apply.) – Marthaª Nov 2 '10 at 14:55
@Seamus: This question reverses the trend, in this case X is a typo – Vinko Vrsalovic Nov 2 '10 at 20:05
up vote 44 down vote accepted

I would say successfull is a typo. Neither Merriam-Webster nor Wiktionary mention it as an alternative spelling. The British National Corpus has 10695 cites for successful and exactly one for successfull. According to OneLook, 33 dictionaries have an entry for successful, but only Wordnik has a few cites for successfull (without a definition).

Edit: by popular request, I will add that the adverb successfully is written with two L's. Successfuly would be incorrect.

share|improve this answer
Yes, "successfully" is correct, but "successfull" is not. And OneLook seems to be a very nice resource for us here (+1 for that link too) – b.roth Nov 2 '10 at 9:24

Only full is spelled with two Ls. All other -ful words are spelled with only one L: helpful, successful, skillful, beautiful.

share|improve this answer
To add an especially interesting case: chock full vs chock-full vs chockful. – RegDwigнt Nov 2 '10 at 15:10
However, skillful vs skilful is a difference between en-us and en-gb. And full undoubles the l when used as a prefix too, as in e.g. fulsome and fulfil. – Peter Taylor Sep 10 '12 at 15:05
Interesting. If you fill a sock with pennies, do you have a sockful or a sockfull? – TimLymington Mar 3 '13 at 20:58
Thank you, will remember this from now on! – Markus Jun 29 at 7:36

protected by tchrist Jan 3 '15 at 3:35

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.