English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it grammatically correct to write (property) is idiosyncratic to (object) in the same way that one could write (property) is unique to (object)?

For example

This feature is idiosyncratic to the Apple Macintosh.

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

It seems so. The Oxford English Dictionary has this 2002 citation from the ‘Atlanta Journal and Constitution’:

The use of panel techniques also enables us to adjust for factors idiosyncratic to each county and for any national time trends in homicide rates.

It may not, however, be common. The Corpus of Contemporary American English has only 16 instances, and the British National Corpus, 6.

share|improve this answer
+1 This seems correct. – Daniel Oct 22 '11 at 20:41

It has the same basic meaning, though it carries a certain amount of value judgement. I take idiosyncratic as being somewhat negative, with unique being somewhat positive.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.