Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why are the hands of a clock called hands? To me, this makes little sense; they do not resemble hands in any way, and if anything body-part related, they should be arms. So why are they called hands?

share|improve this question
Why not also report what you get from Google on the question? – GEdgar Oct 19 '11 at 0:05
@GEdgar I get some unrelated pages, and a Yahoo! Answers that I don't trust. – Mahnax Oct 19 '11 at 0:21

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

They do resemble pointing hands; especially the classic style of hour hand. Yes, they're thinner than human hands, but they point:

Etymonline says this usage of hand is over 400 years old:

Clock and watch sense is from 1570s.

Other than that, I don't think anyone can explain just why clockmakers chose hand instead of arm, or even finger. The point is that they point, like a hand.

share|improve this answer
Fair enough, I suppose. – Mahnax Oct 19 '11 at 0:29
You might just as well ask why a clock's dial is called its 'face'. Or, indeed, why the human face is called 'a clock'. – Barrie England Oct 19 '11 at 6:40
Clocks originally had only an hour hand, and maybe the original hour hand did look more like a hand, like the one in the picture. So that's probably where hand came from; when minute and second hands were added, they took on the same name, though thinner shapes. – Daniel δ Oct 19 '11 at 18:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.