Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

At least to argues E.Pessen in his iconoclastic study of the very rich in the US between 1825 and 1850.

I don't quiet understand both to and argues. Does argues refers to E.Pessen?

Can anyone please turn this sentence into the normal form, such as "E.Pessen argues XXX"?

share|improve this question
3  
It means nothing to me, I'm afraid. There's a mistake there of some kind. –  Barrie England Oct 16 '11 at 9:10
1  
Yep. Definitely a mistake. Could you provide more context? –  Nathan Oct 16 '11 at 9:13
1  
Voting to close. Identifying a simple typo must surely fall into the category of "too localised". –  FumbleFingers Oct 16 '11 at 15:47
    
@FumbleFingers how can i close it myself ? –  warl0ck Oct 16 '11 at 15:50
1  
@FumbleFingers The front page shows the questions basing on when they are edited, a new answer is added, or an old answer has been edited. As I edited this question, it has been jumped on the front page, and hopefully somebody will notice it. –  kiamlaluno Jan 21 '12 at 14:33

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

It's a typo. "to" should be "so". It was fixed in later editions:

See "The Official Guide to the GRE Revised General Test", from the Educational Testing Service: (second sentence on that page)

The quote should be, and is now:

At least so argues E.Pessen in his iconoclastic study of the very rich in the US between 1825 and 1850

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.